<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechMedia &#187; hi-res</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lizhargreaves.com/tag/hi-res/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lizhargreaves.com</link>
	<description>Liz's tech and media musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:10:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Cheap hi-res imaging on the way</title>
		<link>http://www.lizhargreaves.com/2010/01/03/cheap-hi-res-imaging-on-the-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lizhargreaves.com/2010/01/03/cheap-hi-res-imaging-on-the-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 18:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[all posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hi-res]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lizhargreaves.com/?p=930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After finding the term &#8220;gigavision&#8221; in this month&#8217;s Wired magazine&#8217;s Jargon Watch, I had to read more about this technology &#8211; using computer chips as sensors, which allows pixels to be packed 100 times more densely than with CCD or CMOS captures. There doesn&#8217;t appear to be much online about this gigavision yet &#8211; even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After finding the term &#8220;gigavision&#8221; in this month&#8217;s <em>Wired</em> magazine&#8217;s Jargon Watch, I had to read more about this technology &#8211; using computer chips as sensors, which allows pixels to be packed 100 times more densely than with CCD or CMOS captures.</p>
<p>There doesn&#8217;t appear to be much online about this gigavision yet &#8211; even though <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/tag/ccd/" target="_blank">an article</a> in <em>Wired&#8217;s</em> Gadget Lab suggest devices with the <a href="http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/135045?ln=en&#038;of=HD" target="_blank">chip</a> will be available early this year.
</p>
<p>Gigavision will be targeted for cellphones, and not the upper end of imaging (yet).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20427295.100-cheap-naked-chips-snap-a-perfect-picture.html?full=true" target="_blank"><strong>Cheap Naked Chips Snap a Perfect Picture</strong></a> in <em>New Scientist</em> predicts these chip will &#8220;pave the way for cellphones and other inexpensive gadgets that take richer, more pleasing pictures than today&#8217;s devices.&#8221;</p>
<p>These chips are not set to replace CCD and CMOS sensors in the immediate future, but it&#8217;s interesting to see the rise of more hi-res/3D/interactive multi-media pieces.</p>
<p>With the rise of ever cheaper and better quality digital imaging, can film survive? I donated my last film camera years ago, and don&#8217;t miss the darkroom chemicals at all!</p>
<p>Will people still want to view movies in 2D once 3D becomes cheaper and more available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lizhargreaves.com/2010/01/03/cheap-hi-res-imaging-on-the-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

