Vimeo vs. YouTube

26.03.2009 5

It seemed an obvious choice to go with Vimeo to use its embeds as my video portfolio, after all, you need high quality for portfolio pieces. So forked out the $80 to upgrade to Vimeo Plus (5GB per week limit) as just one of my videos pushed me over the free account limit of 500 MB per week.

Had an issue starting off with sound-video falling out of synch. But generally I was happy with the video quality and mused on Twitter/Facebook, “all good in Vimeo land now and quality is so much better than YouTube.”

This drew the attention of video intake producer for CBC Vancouver Charlie Cho, who replied, “But is Vimeo better than YouTube HQ? Not in this random case:”

You Tube Click HQ button

video vs.


Vimeo

I would say that’s a tough call, but I am giving a slight edge to Vimeo for the crispness of its edges. That is assuming that both these videos were uploaded at the same file size.

YouTube allows files of 1GB in size and 10 minutes long, so it’s a better deal than Vimeo for a free account. Vimeo does not have a maximum file size for uploads, but having a 500MB max per week means the maximum file size is really 500MB. I was unable to find any ‘upgrade to pro’ feature for YouTube, let me know if you hear anything about that feature (or lack thereof).

Still, YouTube is tops in terms of users, and on this side-by-side comparison for video sharing sites.

I will continue to post to both YouTube and Vimeo for now … until the next best thing comes along. What is your preferred site for video?

Responses to “Vimeo vs. YouTube”

Trackbacks

  1. Vimeo Vs. YouTube « 2 Snaps and a Twist

Leave a reply